Teaching with Technology
![]() |
| Media Source: giphy.com |
![]() |
| Media Source: giphy.com |
SAMR Model
There are many frameworks for evaluating the use of technology in education each with their own twist on similar concepts. The SAMR model (which reminds me of these famous warriors because of the similar sounding name) is one that I particularly like because it addresses varying levels of technology integration. The model aims to meet teachers where they are and provides opportunities for them to build on their integration as they become more comfortable with technology. Dr. Ruben Puentedura, the creator of the SAMR model, describes the model as an evolutionary process which lends itself to students taking ownership of their learning in the classroom as teachers move through the SAMR model. | Media Source: Dr. Ruben R. Puentedura's Weblog |
How the SAMR Model Works
The model focuses on continual reflection and re-examination of practice to make the best possible use of technology. As the image shows, there are four levels of progression to technology integration:
1. Substitution
2. Augmentation
3. Modification
4. Redefinition
The first two levels, substitution and augmentation, focus on enhancing the practice of educators. At these levels, technology is not imperative to the learning, but has potential to change the functionality of the learning. The next two levels, modification and redefinition, are what I strive to do with my teaching. The technology utilized is engaging but also brings learning to a whole different level.
| Media Source: Kathy Schrock's Guide to Everything |
![]() |
| Media Source: SAMR and Bloom's Taxonomy: Assembling the Puzzle |
How Do I Stack Up Against the Samurai... SAMR Model?
My current position as Instructional Technology Support Teacher is not only new to me this year, but also new to our district at the elementary level. With the word technology in my job title, one would think I would be at the Redefinition level with all of my teaching, but I am not. It's not that I do not strive to reach that level- I'm just not there yet.
One part of my position as the Instructional Technology Support Teacher is to provide Enrichment for students who are performing above grade level in math and reading. To do this, I am currently using the Acellus program to introduce coding to third, fourth, and fifth grade students. This instruction is definitely a part of the Redefinition level because without the technology, it would not be possible for the students to learn how to code our Acellus robots. With my first and second grade students, we have used zSpace to examine 3D models of spaceships and satellites to support our learning of outer space.
However, in my work with all students in grades K-5, most of my teaching is spent at the Substitution or Modification levels. I am still learning the technologies that are available for larger groups while also developing and writing the STREAM curriculum. In time, I am sure we will be able to spend more time on the technology aspect of STREAM. For now, we have been focusing mostly on the engineering portion.
Looking for more on SAMR
SAMR and Bloom's Taxonomy: Assembling the puzzle
Kathy Schrok's Guide to Everything: SAMR and Bloom's
SAMR Model



Thanks for the link to the video of Dr. Puentedura explaining the SAMR Model. I always find it interesting to hear the creator of an idea or process to explain that very topic. I appreciate your honest review of where you are on the SAMR Model. From my own experience it takes time to create lessons that are even at the modification level. I can see how the redefinition level would pose an even greater challenge. Are there ways you can take lessons you are already teaching and use technology differently to move to redefinition?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the great introduction and reflection on SAMR. I'm sure the teachers you work with would be relieved to hear you say that even you want to continue to reach new levels with technology!
ReplyDelete